|
Post by goldsaint17 on Aug 3, 2017 10:16:29 GMT -5
Of course he does, and I told you all this weeks ago, and you told me I was wrong. Now the whole board sees you're the one that was wrong. I get that it hurts, but it's undeniable Actually it proves my point. I said Richard was recruited to play the point and his position was changed after he signed. So I was correct that he was recruited over. You just refuse to admit the facts. But that isn't recruiting over. That is changing his position after watching him play. It'd be one thing if he played the point all year and was solid and JP brought in a new PG to take his job and force him to be a backup. That would be recruiting over. Moving him off the ball since he isn't a capable PG for this team is adapting to the personnel you have.
|
|
|
Post by playerparentcoach on Aug 3, 2017 10:25:51 GMT -5
Actually it proves my point. I said Richard was recruited to play the point and his position was changed after he signed. So I was correct that he was recruited over. You just refuse to admit the facts. But that isn't recruiting over. That is changing his position after watching him play. It'd be one thing if he played the point all year and was solid and JP brought in a new PG to take his job and force him to be a backup. That would be recruiting over. Moving him off the ball since he isn't a capable PG for this team is adapting to the personnel you have. How about finding that out before offerring the scholarship. Richard would not be here if he was not recruited to play the point. Its as simple as that. He did not lose the spot in practice. He was moved in favor of 2 freshmen. So if recruited over bothers you then lets just say Richard was never given an opportunity to play his game here. The type of game he was recruited to play. Why is this still a debate?
|
|
hoopjunkie
Associate Head Coach
Posts: 12,504
Dislikes:
|
Post by hoopjunkie on Aug 3, 2017 10:34:23 GMT -5
Of course he does, and I told you all this weeks ago, and you told me I was wrong. Now the whole board sees you're the one that was wrong. I get that it hurts, but it's undeniable Actually it proves my point. I said Richard was recruited to play the point and his position was changed after he signed. So I was correct that he was recruited over. You just refuse to admit the facts. ...After he failed. Not after he signed. Damn, you were soooooo close to admitting you were wrong. Who cares where he was recruited to play? Penn was recruited for the same position. So was Kadeem. But because your guy is from Baltimore he should be handed the position. Your horse came in last (he's the 4th option at the point right now) Live with it and move on.
|
|
hoopjunkie
Associate Head Coach
Posts: 12,504
Dislikes:
|
Post by hoopjunkie on Aug 3, 2017 10:36:02 GMT -5
But that isn't recruiting over. That is changing his position after watching him play. It'd be one thing if he played the point all year and was solid and JP brought in a new PG to take his job and force him to be a backup. That would be recruiting over. Moving him off the ball since he isn't a capable PG for this team is adapting to the personnel you have. How about finding that out before offerring the scholarship. Richard would not be here if he was not recruited to play the point. Its as simple as that. He did not lose the spot in practice. He was moved in favor of 2 freshmen. So if recruited over bothers you then lets just say Richard was never given an opportunity to play his game here. The type of game he was recruited to play. Why is this still a debate? HE DID LOSE IT IN PRACTICE..LMAO Penn has been beating him like a drum since Christmas. Why is THIS still a debate? hahaha
|
|
rickyp
Junior
Posts: 1,060
Dislikes:
|
Post by rickyp on Aug 3, 2017 10:49:39 GMT -5
PPC i think your right i think Richard was recruited over he was told one thing but HE never developed into that so as a responsible head coach at D1 men's basketball in order to not loose your job you got out and recruit a player or players that can play that position.Then you put the kid at a position that fits the strength of him and the team not what he wants or you think he can play because in the end of the day Siena pays the bill.Maybe the kid has accepted his role because if he wanted to leave known would be smart not waste a another year
|
|
|
Post by playerparentcoach on Aug 3, 2017 11:06:05 GMT -5
Actually it proves my point. I said Richard was recruited to play the point and his position was changed after he signed. So I was correct that he was recruited over. You just refuse to admit the facts. ...After he failed. Not after he signed. Damn, you were soooooo close to admitting you were wrong. Who cares where he was recruited to play? Penn was recruited for the same position. So was Kadeem. But because your guy is from Baltimore he should be handed the position. Your horse came in last (he's the 4th option at the point right now) Live with it and move on. It would not be an issue had he just been beat out on the court. But his position was changed and you refuse to admit that. The position matters for small guards. He chose a school that wanted him as a pg. That is a fact. If the coach thinks the freshmen are better then he brought them in to replace Richard. Hopefully for their sake he doesnt decide that both of them are 2gs as well
|
|
|
Post by playerparentcoach on Aug 3, 2017 11:12:14 GMT -5
PPC i think your right i think Richard was recruited over he was told one thing but HE never developed into that so as a responsible head coach at D1 men's basketball in order to not loose your job you got out and recruit a player or players that can play that position.Then you put the kid at a position that fits the strength of him and the team not what he wants or you think he can play because in the end of the day Siena pays the bill.Maybe the kid has accepted his role because if he wanted to leave known would be smart not waste a another year We are on the same page now. Apparently the coach made a mistake in his evaluations during recruiting. That happens but it moves Richard out of the playing rotation. He is not a better option at the 2 or 3 than what Siena has. So thats why I believe he will transfer. As you saw last year that he did not get many mins at the point and so his time was limited. He knew coming in where he could see the most time and opportunities. But things changed and so Siena is not a good fit for him now
|
|
|
Post by playerparentcoach on Aug 3, 2017 11:13:52 GMT -5
How about finding that out before offerring the scholarship. Richard would not be here if he was not recruited to play the point. Its as simple as that. He did not lose the spot in practice. He was moved in favor of 2 freshmen. So if recruited over bothers you then lets just say Richard was never given an opportunity to play his game here. The type of game he was recruited to play. Why is this still a debate? HE DID LOSE IT IN PRACTICE..LMAO Penn has been beating him like a drum since Christmas. Why is THIS still a debate? hahaha Not true at all. Richard was moved to the 2 and did not compete with Penn for the pg spot.
|
|
rickyp
Junior
Posts: 1,060
Dislikes:
|
Post by rickyp on Aug 3, 2017 11:22:12 GMT -5
Ooh ok so your saying he was never a pg ok known you just admitted it your last message
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Dislikes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2017 11:24:11 GMT -5
HE DID LOSE IT IN PRACTICE..LMAO Penn has been beating him like a drum since Christmas. Why is THIS still a debate? hahaha Not true at all. Richard was moved to the 2 and did not compete with Penn for the pg spot.
|
|
|
Post by playerparentcoach on Aug 3, 2017 11:32:44 GMT -5
Ooh ok so your saying he was never a pg ok known you just admitted it your last message He was recruited to play the point then moved to the 2 when Penn arrived. Is that clear enough for you?
|
|
|
Post by psycholojets on Aug 3, 2017 11:33:07 GMT -5
My guess from afar is that Jimmy did not like what he saw from Richard at the 1 during first semester practices last year. He then adjusted his recruiting targets accordingly.
Sent from my SM-G900P using proboards
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Dislikes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2017 11:34:05 GMT -5
Ooh ok so your saying he was never a pg ok known you just admitted it your last message He was recruited to play the point then moved to the 2 when Penn arrived. Is that clear enough for you? Or maybe Penn arrived BECAUSE he was moved to the 2? Ever think of that?
|
|
|
Post by playerparentcoach on Aug 3, 2017 11:35:49 GMT -5
Just close the case on Richard. I am sure he will try to play where he is told and assume whatever role the staff wants. He has no shot to play tbe point while at Siena. So you all should be happy and I hope the freshmen can get the job done for the team. Time to move on. Patsos has made his choice clear.
|
|
|
Post by playerparentcoach on Aug 3, 2017 11:37:09 GMT -5
My guess from afar is that Jimmy did not like what he saw from Richard at the 1 during first semester practices last year. He then adjusted his recruiting targets accordingly. Sent from my SM-G900P using proboards That makes sense as well. So it fits what I know about his recruitment.
|
|