|
|
Post by MTS on Apr 21, 2016 15:27:56 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Dislikes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 15:44:49 GMT -5
I've been expecting the sophomore jump from him for a year. Can't wait to see him out there again.
|
|
|
|
Post by siena12077 on Apr 21, 2016 16:20:15 GMT -5
It will be nice if he can come in off the bench and keep the defense honest by continuing to stretch the floor
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Dislikes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 16:53:14 GMT -5
It will be nice if he can come in off the bench and keep the defense honest by continuing to stretch the floor Fisher already does that. I want WB for his defense. Fisher doesn't make his presence known on that side of the ball. WB forces turnovers and blocks shots with his bouncy energy. That's what I miss most. Rates per 1000 mins as frosh:WB = 53 steals, 35 blocks Fisher = 7 steals, 11 blocks WB played 396 mins and had 21steals and 14 blocks Fisher played 282 mins and had 2 steals and 3 blocks WB shot 9 of 20 from three (45%) Fisher shot 8 of 14 from three (57%) WB Rebounds per 30 mins = 6.1 boards Fisher Rebounds per 30 mins = 4.3 boards |
|
|
|
Post by billmurray on Apr 21, 2016 16:57:33 GMT -5
It will be nice if he can come in off the bench and keep the defense honest by continuing to stretch the floor Fisher already does that. I want WB for his defense. Fisher doesn't make his presence known on that side of the ball. WB forces turnovers and blocks shots with his bouncy energy. That's what I miss most. Rates per 1000 mins as frosh:WB = 53 steals, 35 blocks Fisher = 7 steals, 11 blocks WB played 396 mins and had 21steals and 14 blocks Fisher played 282 mins and had 2 steals and 3 blocks WB shot 9 of 20 from three (45%) Fisher shot 8 of 14 from three (57%) WB Rebounds per 30 mins = 6.1 boards Fisher Rebounds per 30 mins = 4.3 boards If they both make a "sophomore" bump having both available would be a good thing, Fisher sub for JO and Brandwijk subbing for Bisping. If Brandwijk can become Bisping-like intensity-wise with the added athleticism that would be great. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Dislikes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2016 17:04:34 GMT -5
Fisher already does that. I want WB for his defense. Fisher doesn't make his presence known on that side of the ball. WB forces turnovers and blocks shots with his bouncy energy. That's what I miss most. Rates per 1000 mins as frosh:WB = 53 steals, 35 blocks Fisher = 7 steals, 11 blocks WB played 396 mins and had 21steals and 14 blocks Fisher played 282 mins and had 2 steals and 3 blocks WB shot 9 of 20 from three (45%) Fisher shot 8 of 14 from three (57%) WB Rebounds per 30 mins = 6.1 boards Fisher Rebounds per 30 mins = 4.3 boards If they both make a "sophomore" bump having both available would be a good thing, Fisher sub for JO and Brandwijk subbing for Bisping. If Brandwijk can become Bisping-like intensity-wise with the added athleticism that would be great. And where does Long play? Fisher only averaged 8 mpg last year. Silas averaged 4.9 mpg but only played in 20 games. If it were my decision, those minutes go straight to WB and it's Fisher's turn to work on his defense and foot work. Either he learns to play D and rebound or he can never play major minutes. |
|
|
|
Post by billmurray on Apr 21, 2016 17:48:43 GMT -5
Long get minutes at SF and PF as needed.
|
|
CellarRat
Assistant Coach
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,334
Dislikes:
|
Post by CellarRat on Apr 21, 2016 18:13:38 GMT -5
I'm excited about him, for some reason he reminds me of wignot who I felt never reached his potential. Hopefully WB does. I think year 4 of the rebuild is going to be real special. |
|
