indian82
Assistant Coach
Posts: 6,450
Dislikes:
|
Post by indian82 on Jun 12, 2014 6:03:00 GMT -5
To paraphrase Hilary 'What difference does it make what natioanality they are?' The point is they come across the Mexican border. That's the only border we have any control over. If we caught 10 people sneaking in and 5 were Mexican, 5 Guatemalan (although asking them to produce ID proving it would be racist  ) would we just send the Mexicans back? |
|
gorvy
Associate Head Coach
Posts: 10,047
Dislikes:
|
Post by gorvy on Jun 12, 2014 6:11:18 GMT -5
Send the short ones back (almost all of them,) and keep the tall ones, unless they can replace Landon Donovan on the USMNT. We need the tall ones to fill up my Knicks, Giants, and Saints.
|
|
CellarRat
Assistant Coach
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,348
Dislikes:
|
Post by CellarRat on Jun 12, 2014 7:08:44 GMT -5
To paraphrase Hilary 'What difference does it make what natioanality they are?' The point is they come across the Mexican border. That's the only border we have any control over. If we caught 10 people sneaking in and 5 were Mexican, 5 Guatemalan (although asking them to produce ID proving it would be racist ) would we just send the Mexicans back? This is the reasoning MP is incapable of. The dems and liberals in particular do not want immigration control on the Mexican-US border. This patent dishonestly should offend all reasonable Americans. |
|
CellarRat
Assistant Coach
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,348
Dislikes:
|
Post by CellarRat on Jun 12, 2014 7:18:27 GMT -5
Your administration, pure genius. Katrina' of illegal immigrants flooding into border states daily nyp.st/1ofqv3tLMAO, you shot down your own previous post - read what you linked - where are they coming from and how do they get here - CENTRAL AMERICA - across the secure (your word) Guatamallan border! We need to fix it but the fix will require bipartisan support and your Republican buddies won't touch it - they are too busy trying to court the Latino vote - securing the border should be a slam dunk in terms of support but no, they want to fix the extremely difficult issue with those already here while allowing the influx to continue. I said "more restrictive", with regard to the Guatemalan border with Mexico. Given the time on your hands you would think you would have better reading comprehension skills. Regarding your comment on bipartisan support, your party is a dishonest pack of demagogues. They want annexation by immigration, another example of "spreading the wealth". The dems have no interest in securing the border or enforcing the laws against illegal immigration and illegal aliens. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Dislikes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2014 7:37:07 GMT -5
LMAO, you shot down your own previous post - read what you linked - where are they coming from and how do they get here - CENTRAL AMERICA - across the secure (your word) Guatamallan border! We need to fix it but the fix will require bipartisan support and your Republican buddies won't touch it - they are too busy trying to court the Latino vote - securing the border should be a slam dunk in terms of support but no, they want to fix the extremely difficult issue with those already here while allowing the influx to continue. I said "more restrictive", with regard to the Guatemalan border with Mexico. Given the time on your hands you would think you would have better reading comprehension skills. Regarding your comment on bipartisan support, your party is a dishonest pack of demagogues. They want annexation by immigration, another example of "spreading the wealth". The dems have no interest in securing the border or enforcing the laws against illegal immigration and illegal aliens. Sort of like comparing a sieve to a colander! Annexation by immigration - wow, that's a new one. So tell us all, what exactly is the Republican plan that the Democrats are opposing? Last time I looked, the Republicans want nothing to do with the issue until after the election. I don't have as much time on my hands as you would think so I may have missed an article on the Republican Grand Plan. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Dislikes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2014 7:56:34 GMT -5
Brat still has a good chance to win the general election. The GOP will easily retain the house. It also appears the GOP has a strong chance to retake the senate. As for 2016 who knows..but the GOP can't throw the Hispanic vote away otherwise we're looking at Hillary Clinton. We need some common sense immigration reform.
You may be right (pun intended) since his district is solidly Republican but I doubt he will be elected in a general election. He's obviously one dimensional as evidenced by his first encounter with the press when he said "I don't know!" to a question on the minimum wage - c'mon - the guy is an economics professor!
www.dailykos.com/story/2014/06/11/1306186/-The-newest-GOP-star-beat-Eric-Cantor-but-can-t-organize-a-press-conference#His staff of 2 quickly got him out of the limelight and said they would later issue a statement.
Brat claims that this was a victory from GOD - OMG - he beat one of the few Republican Jews - so he believes God plays favorites in politics as well as athletics! Amazing.
Here is a taste of how his campaign manager thinks:
gawker.com/the-campaign-manager-who-beat-eric-cantor-just-deleted-1589410682
We have ultra-cons, neo-cons (they sure got Iraq right didn't they) and now whacko-cons! Face it, it's all a con job........ |
|
) would we just send the Mexicans back?
