Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Dislikes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2016 16:16:14 GMT -5
Darg and Patsos cant bring in a steady diet of Loyola, Cornell's, Ark pine bluff? I mean what is a AE team the high light of our home schedule next year? Hey Darg how about the fans ( you know the people that pay the bills) once in awhile It appears Vt is the highlight. You want to make sure there's victories with that senior laden team......
|
|
sky
Junior
Posts: 1,052
Dislikes:
|
Post by sky on Feb 12, 2016 20:04:50 GMT -5
Potential recruits are knocking the doors down to play our schedule....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Dislikes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2016 21:03:59 GMT -5
I thought this year was a much easier schedule than people were saying. But Bonnies, UA, and Hofstra were all decent and Duke and Wisconsin were tough. It was easy after that but it wasn't too bad.
Kansas is the only guaranteed top 100 team in the bunch. UNC Asheville will probably be next.
The rest of the teams lose a lot to graduation.
No kidding, Siena shouldn't have more than 5 or 6 losses total with that schedule and next year's team.
26+ wins is nice and all but not when the rpi is 205.
|
|
saints22
Team Captain
Posts: 2,224
Dislikes:
|
Post by saints22 on Feb 12, 2016 21:22:53 GMT -5
Looking at it from another perspective, we are becoming more and more like a high major, scheduling "cupcakes" at home. Siena is on the way to becoming the next Syracuse. ;-) Does that mean we should anticipate being placed on probation, and having to vacate x number of wins, sometime in the future?
|
|
|
Post by Tony on Feb 12, 2016 21:28:50 GMT -5
I thought this year was a much easier schedule than people were saying. But Bonnies, UA, and Hofstra were all decent and Duke and Wisconsin were tough. It was easy after that but it wasn't too bad. Kansas is the only guaranteed top 100 team in the bunch. UNC Asheville will probably be next. The rest of the teams lose a lot to graduation. No kidding, Siena shouldn't have more than 5 or 6 losses total with that schedule and next year's team. 26+ wins is nice and all but not when the rpi is 205. Obviously next year is all about Jimmy getting a new contract( at least to Jimmy) I certainly hope Siena waits till after JO-Wright-Brett-Lavon graduate to see how Jimmy does. While some fall back is understandable program shouldn't fall off face of earth with good recruiting now( he will have Cam/Paige to carry Saints)
|
|
gorvy
Associate Head Coach
Posts: 10,020
Dislikes:
|
Post by gorvy on Feb 12, 2016 21:39:01 GMT -5
Never going to get a 13 seed with this schedule but I won't worry about that till they actually get in.
|
|
|
Post by MTS on Feb 12, 2016 21:42:29 GMT -5
Never going to get a 13 seed with this schedule but I won't worry about that till they actually get in. Don't know about that. We easily could be a 13 this year if we finish strong and win the tournament. Actually if we aren't a 13 it isn't for lack if schedule but because a few bad losses (Cornell, Marist). Now if you say we're not getting a 9 seed with that schedule I would agree. But like you said let's get in first!
|
|
|
Post by MTS on Feb 12, 2016 21:53:05 GMT -5
I thought this year was a much easier schedule than people were saying. But Bonnies, UA, and Hofstra were all decent and Duke and Wisconsin were tough. It was easy after that but it wasn't too bad. Kansas is the only guaranteed top 100 team in the bunch. UNC Asheville will probably be next. The rest of the teams lose a lot to graduation. No kidding, Siena shouldn't have more than 5 or 6 losses total with that schedule and next year's team. 26+ wins is nice and all but not when the rpi is 205. Your RPI isn't going to be 200 if you go 25-6.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Dislikes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2016 21:57:52 GMT -5
I thought this year was a much easier schedule than people were saying. But Bonnies, UA, and Hofstra were all decent and Duke and Wisconsin were tough. It was easy after that but it wasn't too bad. Kansas is the only guaranteed top 100 team in the bunch. UNC Asheville will probably be next. The rest of the teams lose a lot to graduation. No kidding, Siena shouldn't have more than 5 or 6 losses total with that schedule and next year's team. 26+ wins is nice and all but not when the rpi is 205. Your RPI isn't going to be 200 if you go 25-6.
|
|
SaintMisbehavin
Team Captain
Legacy. Alum. Hoops Lover. Hyper-Niche Amateur Blog Runner
Posts: 2,433
Dislikes:
|
Post by SaintMisbehavin on Feb 12, 2016 22:22:46 GMT -5
What decent BCS team wants to play Siena at the TUC next year? That's just silly scheduling on their part if they did want to.
Blame the admin for not already having a 2-for-1 not already locked up with a major, but to fault them for not getting higher caliber home games at this juncture seems silly.
The good news? The "teams don't want to play us at home" argument is back, baby.
|
|
OneIndian
Associate Head Coach
Posts: 10,689
Dislikes:
|
Post by OneIndian on Feb 12, 2016 22:26:37 GMT -5
I thought this year was a much easier schedule than people were saying. But Bonnies, UA, and Hofstra were all decent and Duke and Wisconsin were tough. It was easy after that but it wasn't too bad. Kansas is the only guaranteed top 100 team in the bunch. UNC Asheville will probably be next. The rest of the teams lose a lot to graduation. No kidding, Siena shouldn't have more than 5 or 6 losses total with that schedule and next year's team. 26+ wins is nice and all but not when the rpi is 205. Obviously next year is all about Jimmy getting a new contract( at least to Jimmy) I certainly hope Siena waits till after JO-Wright-Brett-Lavon graduate to see how Jimmy does. While some fall back is understandable program shouldn't fall off face of earth with good recruiting now( he will have Cam/Paige to carry Saints) EXACTLY .. Powder puff schedule by design. Do they think we can't see that ..... That schedule is a joke. Major holes when those boys graduate!
|
|
siena70
Freshman
Posts: 291
Dislikes:
|
Post by siena70 on Feb 13, 2016 5:08:53 GMT -5
JP and D'Arg are all about extending their contracts. The President and BOT don't get it and do not push for the program to be Siena's signature PR.
|
|
skipc
Sophomore
Posts: 597
Dislikes:
|
Post by skipc on Feb 13, 2016 7:16:05 GMT -5
What decent BCS team wants to play Siena at the TUC next year? That's just silly scheduling on their part if they did want to. Blame the admin for not already having a 2-for-1 not already locked up with a major, but to fault them for not getting higher caliber home games at this juncture seems silly. The good news? The "teams don't want to play us at home" argument is back, baby. Like Iowa?
|
|
|
Post by billmurray on Feb 13, 2016 7:24:29 GMT -5
Looking at it from another perspective, we are becoming more and more like a high major, scheduling "cupcakes" at home. Siena is on the way to becoming the next Syracuse. ;-) Does that mean we should anticipate being placed on probation, and having to vacate x number of wins, sometime in the future? Not for at least 30-40 years. The NCAA moves slowly in these matters.
|
|
|
Post by onionsbaby on Feb 13, 2016 9:13:38 GMT -5
Kind of a boring schedule- Isn't there a better tournament option? Lots of garbage games to play at Kansas- Can't we start some series with a Villanova-Xavier-Butler-Temple -even if we have to do a two for one-Next year this team could have a high ceiling-Should look to schedule more up games for RPI-Similar to what Monmouth did this year-they have put themselves in great at large bid position with winning the up games-Next years schedule a disappointment for what could potentially be a big year for the team
|
|