gorvy
Associate Head Coach
Posts: 10,016
Dislikes:
|
Post by gorvy on Oct 15, 2020 19:21:40 GMT -5
|
|
hoopjunkie
Associate Head Coach
Posts: 12,474
Dislikes:
|
Post by hoopjunkie on Oct 15, 2020 21:47:45 GMT -5
So Iona will have 20 kids on scholarship next year? Wow, this should be fun.
|
|
$cott
Assistant Coach
Posts: 5,071
Dislikes:
|
Post by $cott on Oct 16, 2020 9:09:13 GMT -5
Another year with Camper sure would be fun and of course for Pickett as well. I assume this also means that Carpenter will still be a freshman in 2021-2022? Of course, they will probably play it smart and all graduate on time to keep their options open. Opens up quite the opportunity for grad transfers as they will not be able to get a full two years of grad school paid.
|
|
bigsaintg
Assistant Coach
Posts: 6,949
Dislikes:
|
Post by bigsaintg on Oct 17, 2020 12:05:45 GMT -5
Speaking of giving extra years of eligibility, I saw JO walking around downtown Troy. He is exactly what we need to round out our team - maybe we get him an extra year somehow in this whacky system.
|
|
indian82
Assistant Coach
Posts: 6,450
Dislikes:
|
Post by indian82 on Oct 17, 2020 15:08:08 GMT -5
I'm not sure I like the idea of the extra year. I can't see Pickett staying nor would I THINK Manny would stay either. How does this affect the classes and future freshman? That is, say, 1-3 guys stay every year for the next 3-4 years. Seems like that would discourage underclassmen. Or I can also see th best juniors being more apt to transfer. Take Jalen for example - if he has 2 more years after this year, he may want to try a bigger school. Seems like they will have to be VERY strict on waivers.
I can also see it putting a big strain on finances if they're paying for extra scholarships. I don't think I am a fan of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by saints15 on Oct 17, 2020 16:02:15 GMT -5
I'm not sure I like the idea of the extra year. I can't see Pickett staying nor would I THINK Manny would stay either. How does this affect the classes and future freshman? That is, say, 1-3 guys stay every year for the next 3-4 years. Seems like that would discourage underclassmen. Or I can also see th best juniors being more apt to transfer. Take Jalen for example - if he has 2 more years after this year, he may want to try a bigger school. Seems like they will have to be VERY strict on waivers. I can also see it putting a big strain on finances if they're paying for extra scholarships. I don't think I am a fan of it. Not a fan of this either. There was no reason to make this decision so early. Wait and see how it goes. It looks like the NCAA is going to implement the no sit out transfer rule (another bad idea in my opinion) next year so waivers won’t be an issue |
|
indian82
Assistant Coach
Posts: 6,450
Dislikes:
|
Post by indian82 on Oct 17, 2020 16:19:28 GMT -5
I'm not sure I like the idea of the extra year. I can't see Pickett staying nor would I THINK Manny would stay either. How does this affect the classes and future freshman? That is, say, 1-3 guys stay every year for the next 3-4 years. Seems like that would discourage underclassmen. Or I can also see th best juniors being more apt to transfer. Take Jalen for example - if he has 2 more years after this year, he may want to try a bigger school. Seems like they will have to be VERY strict on waivers. I can also see it putting a big strain on finances if they're paying for extra scholarships. I don't think I am a fan of it. Not a fan of this either. There was no reason to make this decision so early. Wait and see how it goes. It looks like the NCAA is going to implement the no sit out transfer rule (another bad idea in my opinion) next year so waivers won’t be an issue Geez - I forgot about the no-sit. With an extra year and no-sit, I can see even more transfers than normal, esp from the mids. |
|
|
|
Post by sienasaint3 on Oct 19, 2020 17:09:19 GMT -5
I'm not sure I like the idea of the extra year. I can't see Pickett staying nor would I THINK Manny would stay either. How does this affect the classes and future freshman? That is, say, 1-3 guys stay every year for the next 3-4 years. Seems like that would discourage underclassmen. Or I can also see th best juniors being more apt to transfer. Take Jalen for example - if he has 2 more years after this year, he may want to try a bigger school. Seems like they will have to be VERY strict on waivers. I can also see it putting a big strain on finances if they're paying for extra scholarships. I don't think I am a fan of it. Not a fan of this either. There was no reason to make this decision so early. Wait and see how it goes. It looks like the NCAA is going to implement the no sit out transfer rule (another bad idea in my opinion) next year so waivers won’t be an issue Nice to see something benefit the student athletes for once. |
|
|
|
Post by saints15 on Oct 19, 2020 18:58:07 GMT -5
Not a fan of this either. There was no reason to make this decision so early. Wait and see how it goes. It looks like the NCAA is going to implement the no sit out transfer rule (another bad idea in my opinion) next year so waivers won’t be an issue Nice to see something benefit the student athletes for once. I think getting your college education paid for is a pretty good benefit for a student athlete. |
|
|
|
Post by sienasaint3 on Oct 20, 2020 15:04:20 GMT -5
Nice to see something benefit the student athletes for once. I think getting your college education paid for is a pretty good benefit for a student athlete. The fact that you don't like that they will get an extra year due to having their career impacted by COVID because they could transfer to another school is pretty ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Post by saints15 on Oct 20, 2020 21:32:28 GMT -5
I think getting your college education paid for is a pretty good benefit for a student athlete. The fact that you don't like that they will get an extra year due to having their career impacted by COVID because they could transfer to another school is pretty ridiculous. If you read my original comment I didn’t say I was against them getting an extra year because of Covid. I said it didn’t make sense to make the decision now. No reason they couldn’t have waited. |
|
|
|
Post by Tony on Oct 21, 2020 4:55:07 GMT -5
At end of day I think Siena will make out good on this- and have others have said very good for student athletes
|
|
$cott
Assistant Coach
Posts: 5,071
Dislikes:
|
Post by $cott on Oct 21, 2020 7:28:31 GMT -5
The fact that you don't like that they will get an extra year due to having their career impacted by COVID because they could transfer to another school is pretty ridiculous. If you read my original comment I didn’t say I was against them getting an extra year because of Covid. I said it didn’t make sense to make the decision now. No reason they couldn’t have waited. I think the concern was if they waited any longer they would wind up with entire teams opting to redshirt rather than waste eligibility on an uncertain season. This way every conference can go ahead and schedule without that concern. |
|
|
|
Post by greengold4ever on Oct 21, 2020 9:26:18 GMT -5
the extra year is great for the athletes because of this covid crisis, although one has to wonder what it does to scholarships & rosters for any school...................sorry, but the no-sit transfer rule (and I think it is a one time for the student athlete) is going to change the game in a big negative way, mid-majors like Siena are gonna feel the pain of possibly having talented players leave immediately for bigger schools, thus making it harder to keep talent.........this only caters to those power schools who want to gobble up as much talent as possible with no considerations what so ever...........if the NCAA was more consistent with how they grant waivers then the current system of sitting out a year would still be effective, and besides do they really want to double or triple the # of transfers every year, makes no sense, imho................
|
|
